Anarquía, Estado y Utopía has ratings and reviews. Con este libro, Robert Nozick se convirtió en el principal defensor teórico del liberalismo en las . Tratado acerca de la funcion del Estado moderno, en el que se exponen algunas tesis para la posible creacion de un nuevo Estado minimo, asi como una. Anarquia, Estado y Utopia by Robert Nozick, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.
|Published (Last):||27 May 2013|
|PDF File Size:||1.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
I personally have only read excerpts. But a fun madman. Dec 28, SeRRo rated it liked it. They throw your vote in with theirs. But I essentially ran out of time and interest and am not sure I will ever get back to it. The main concerns that most people have with libertarian ideas are utilitarian ones.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
Yet he is also a very formal and dense writer I don’t see these as negatives, especially in this case. Robert Nozick is at his best as a critic, and the best part of this book is the critical part.
Jan 21, Ryan rated it liked it Shelves: However, I have problems recommending it to many other than those who wish to read up on libertarianism for the sake of doing so, if for nothing else than for that it is so dreadfully boring. So it’s a bit robdrt a natural monopoly locally and it’s not something too distasteful.
Of course this has always been the main criticism of Social Contract theory, and the rejoinder is as old as that theory itself: After that things get bad. The famous “Wilt Chamberlin” argument falls apart once you expand the concept even a little further.
Trivia About Anarchy, State, a Rightful ownership can only come from 1 original acquisition by appropriating previously un-owned objects, 2 free transfer, including trade and gifts, and 3 rectification, whereby we compensate those whose rights have been violated. Side constraints recognize that ethics is about the pursuit of ends rather than the end itself and so certain kinds of actions need to be restrained between individuals in principle to allow autonomy to pursue what is good.
The main problem with the book is that it is not very impassioned or poetic. Nozick f I rather wish I had read this a long time ago, because now I want to know how everything that has occurred since it was written has reacted to it.
After the discussion you mark your vote on a slip of paper, and they go off and vote.
Anarquia, Estado y Utopia : Robert Nozick :
His attempted critiques of utilitarianism didn’t go much beyond the classic ‘Utility Monster’ and ‘Experience Machine’ thoughts experiments Very thought provoking book. Rawls proposed the ‘maximin principle’, which would induce rational individuals in the ‘veil of ignorance’ thought experiment to choose a redistributive state.
This is very much an analytical work in style and nzick, discovering the implications and internal contradictions of various ethical, legal and political positions with logical rigor and precision. One of my favorite sections of the book p. My essay was quite well received but it made me feel queasy, and the more I thought about it the queasier I felt. I have a feeling that his obscuration of fairness is deceptive, but that would impart ill-intention on his part.
I was a committed socialist with anarchist leanings a huge dichotomy there which I didn’t see at the nozidk Robert Nozick is at his best as a critic, and the best part of this book is the critical part. He is an interesting writer and I do not regret having read his book. Nozick abandons philosophical proof or argumentation as too coercive and opts instead for methods of explanation that promote understanding.
After the discussion you mark your vote on a slip of amarquia, and nzick go off and vote.
Nevertheless, the overall view is highly implausible and supported by very weak arguments. And what is to keep these protective agencies from becoming private goon squads?
In the latter case, allowing the criminal to “do his best” isn’t acceptable. With it, Nozick demonstrates that a minimal state is compatible with libertarian principles, that you don’t utoopia to go all the way towards anarchism like Rothbard did.
And if we introduce the right for healthcare, even in its most libertarian form aarquia ri The author carefully proved moral possibility and necessity of the minimal state.
If we charge criminals dstado high in a tort system, so that they refuse to commit any more crime, we will not have broken the system, we will have perfected it. One of the very few philosophy books I ever had a hard time putting down. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone.
Anarquía, Estado y Utopía by Robert Nozick (4 star ratings)
Basically Robert Nozick argues for small government because there is no process by which any intervening distribution could be fair. This means that many of the present apparatuses of the state as we know it no longer exist. Any other goods or services should be provided by private actions business or donationsand any redistribution of wealth is a violation of property rights.
He roebrt handle extremely abstract concepts.