Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army is a book written by independent journalist Jeremy Scahill, published by Nation Books in. That said, I’ll say that Jeremy Scahill’s “Blackwater” gets points for reportage, for his interviews and legwork. “Blackwater”, unlike P.W. Singer’s “Corporate. Book Review of Jeremy Scahill, Blackwater: the. Rise of the Most Powerful Mercenary Army. (/) and From Mercenaries to Market: the Rise and.

Author: Goltikus Shar
Country: Qatar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 8 November 2016
Pages: 294
PDF File Size: 4.93 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.46 Mb
ISBN: 642-5-31867-520-8
Downloads: 34006
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tushura

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to glackwater. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again. Open Preview Jerey a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — Blackwater by Jeremy Scahill. On September 16,machine gun fire erupted in Baghdad’s Nisour Square, leaving seventeen Iraqi civilians dead, among them women and children.

The shooting spree, labeled “Baghdad’s Bloody Sunday,” was neither the work of Iraqi insurgents nor U. The shooters were private forces working for the secretive mercenary company, Blackwater Worldwide.

This is the On September 16,machine gun fire erupted in Baghdad’s Nisour Square, leaving seventeen Iraqi civilians dead, among them women and children. This blackwaater the explosive story of a company that rose a decade ago from Moyock, North Carolina, to become one of the most powerful players in the “War on Terror.

Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army

Hardcoverpages. Published March 8th by Nation Books first published To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Blackwaterplease sign up.

Lists with This Book. Erik Prince accused of murder. I had no idea the depth of antagonism toward the Clinton election evinced by such stalwarts as Scalia, Colson, Dobson, et al who, in public statements, suggested that any ruler, elected or otherwise, who was not following the divine mandate as they understood it to be, deserved to be overthrown, violently if necessary.

The level of their vitriol is astonishing. Place the rise of Erick Prinz’s private army, the Blackwater folks, and you have a scarry scenario, since Prinz and his family were in the forefront of support for these guys.

The Journal: Jeremy Scahill on Blackwater

Support for privatization of military support had begun with Cheney and Rumsfeld long before their Bush the 2nd years as they reduced the military budget. Cheney’s connections to Halliburton and KBR made his motivation suspect since they would be primary beneficiaries of government largess for such a scheme. There is no question that the Blackwater “mercenaries” I think they meet the standard definition of the word and Blackwater scahil many non-US nationals, so why quibble unless you are trying to obfuscate.

The biggest concern I have after reading this book is that the Scahil, States government had ceded foreign policy to a corporate entity. Clearly, the Blackwater folks had a very broad mandate in their jereym to protect civilians. They could interpret that charge in any way they saw fit and we all know that a good offense is the best defense. The military, whose soldiers made about a fifth of the mercenary salary, were often forced to come to the aid of the Blackwater folks who might have begun a sxahill engagement in a situation, where, for policy reasons, the US government or military did not want to engage troops.

That the mercenaries had been specifically exempted from the standard rules of engagement which applied to the military could only make things worse. This included the use of non-standard weapons.

One Blackwater type admitted to using “blended blavkwater bullets” which made virtually any impact fatal. In its infinite wisdom, the administration Bremer decided to make contractors immune from any prosectution for crimes committeed while in Iraq while performing their role under contract. That gave them virtual license to do whatever they wanted since Bremer had also ruled that the Uniform Code of Military Justice also did not apply.


In addition, Congress and the administration permitted them to conduct their business in secret since they were private companies and even blackwwter to vote down an anti-war-profteering bill proposed by Senator Leahy.

Now think about that, they were saying, in essence, go ahead and make all the money you blacowater, however you want, and screww the government all you want, because we say it’s OK. Let’s face it, it’s all about money. Rumsfeld and Cheney wanted most of the cost of the war off the books, they didn’t want any kind of draft that would have forced the US to take a close look at their policies, they wanted their companies Halliburton and Blackwater – a major Republican contributor to make a blackwtaer of money, which they have.

Not only that, but these private armies became instruments of hidden policy. The “Caspian Guard” operation used Blackwater troops to guard the oil pipeline through Georgia after the US helped to subvert the government of Eduard Amvrosiyevich Shevardnadze during the so called Rose Revolution in favor of Mikheil Nikolozis dze Saakashvili because the former wasn’t pro-US enough.

Using these private armies, I believe, carries significant risks for the United States. Should they be attacked, it’s most likely whatever administration is in power would come under enormous pressure to send in the troops.

Not only that, but the companies insist they are not responsible for benefits for the blackaater of those killed while under contract. That’s the US government’s job. So we get screwed twice. It’s blackwwter for a scahill debate on the role of private contractors as instruments of foreign policy, and I suggest it may go beyond the military’s impact.

Clearly corporations with a large presence in a foreign country will have a decidedly different view of US hegemony and imperialism than Washington. So here I am reading this book and a thought springs to mind.

What organization in the United States would have the manpower, the most to lose, the true belief, and the money to engage in regime change in the United States.

Nah, I must be just paranoid, right? View all 24 scaahill. Jul 05, Joshua rated it liked it Recommends it for: Jeeemy, first some literary criticism. And I hate to do this, because I saw Jeremy Scahill speak a few months ago and I genuinely liked him. He’s brilliant, he obviously knows what’s going on in the world, scabill a first-class investigative journalist, a crusader for the truth, and I sincerely applaud him for what he does.

But, though the story of Blackwater is gripping, chilling, and more than just a little sinister more on that laterI have to honestly say that carrying around this blackwatter and rea Okay, first some literary criticism.

But, though the story of Blackwater is gripping, chilling, and more than just a little sinister more on that laterI have to honestly say that carrying around this book and reading it over the course of about a month was more of a burden than a joy.

Yes, of course there’s nothing about it that should make one feel joy, and maybe it had more to do with my state of mind at the time, but something about the actual style and mode of writing turned me off. Fact thrown upon fact thrown upon fact, reinforced by supporting facts, and somewhat long and convoluted digressions of even more facts thrown in just to make sure the reader is paying attention.

Yes, we get it, you did your research. But the story itself–and the dramatic pacing specifically–suffer because of this never-ending barrage of facts. Yes, again, I understand this is nonfiction–not the latest Michael Crichton political thriller–and maybe others feel differently, but reading this book was like trudging through mud, or wading in quicksand, or stumbling lbackwater all flights of stairs in the Sears Tower dragging a ball and chain: Maybe I’m being too critical.


I sure hope Mr. Scahill doesn’t read this.

Don’t scahilo me wrong, I am disturbed by the fact that our government is semi-secretly building a corporate army the new “Praetorian Guard” as the author calls it to loyally serve the far right, that this army seems so far to be impervious to any attempt to hold it accountable for its actions in the way that the actual military is to some degree anywayetc.

Even writing a review of this book has drained me to the point where I blckwater throw an “et cetera” at the end of my sentence because I don’t feel like blwckwater on anymore.

I’ll end on this note: Oh yeah, the same incentive that our current government has–none, to be exact. And that is scary. So, thank you Mr.

Scahill for your hard work and dedication in exposing this story and bringing it to a mass audience. I promise I will never again say a bad word about you. View all 7 comments. Jul 11, Jeremy rated it did not like it. Yes, I read the whole book. No, I don’t think it was worth my time or money. Like many other reviewers, I bought this book hoping to get a historical perspective on the Blackwater company. Instead, I got a heavily biased opinion piece on the US Government’s use of military contractors.

Scahill cites many quotes and facts in his book, but most of these are from heavily biased liberal writers or publications, and most of these cited works are opinion pieces, not factual evidence. Worse Yes, I read the whole book. Worse yet, Scahill himself admits he didn’t research or write most of this book, rather one of his graduate assistants did read the foreward.

The author strays off topic repeatedly, droning on about the keremy of the religious right within the US Government, or about other contractors besides Blackwater. The total factual information about Blackwater contained in this book could have easily been condensed down to pages or less.

Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army – Wikipedia

And should have been. The author’s anti-Christian and left-leaning Liberal bias is so strong as to taint any facts presented in this text, regardless of whether you are liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat.

That’s a shame, since there is some interesting information presented in the book. If you want to find out more about Blackwater, read something else. If you want to reinforce your own Liberal bias against the US Government View all 3 comments. What is the downfall of empires associated with?

Scwhill the building of ever more massive mercenary acahill Please note that I put the original German text at the end of this review. Just if you might be interested. The basis for the tremendous success balckwater the now repeatedly renamed security firm Blackwater put the Republican initiatives in the term of George W Bush, which relied on the massive privatization of the American military.

Initially, logistics and supply tasks were primarily to be placed in What is the downfall of empires associated with?

The Journal: Jeremy Scahill on Blackwater | Bill Moyers | PBS

Initially, logistics and supply tasks were primarily to be placed in the hands of private companies so that the army could concentrate on the primary responsibility of the struggle. It did not take a decade, however, until a private army of 50, men emerged.

This, armed with immunity from blackwated and the duties and responsibilities of the police and military, could also operate within Western democracies.

The analogies jermy events in world history show to what such tendencies lead.