Results 17 – 32 of 38 by Bruce G Trigger; Hiroyuki Kawanishi Historia del Pensamiento Arqueologico by James F.P. Pendergast and Bruce G. Trigger. Buy Historia del Pensamiento Arqueologico by Bruce G. Trigger (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on. Historia del Pensamiento Arqueologico: Bruce G. Trigger: Books –

Author: Brajas Faejas
Country: Papua New Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 28 May 2008
Pages: 479
PDF File Size: 5.42 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.17 Mb
ISBN: 263-7-12780-418-9
Downloads: 3984
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yorn

Phillips, Rob; Brocklehurst, Helen Ed. In a previous work, this same author had already recognized that the category was considerably ambiguous, then the question is, how can we achieve the This is a question without an answer, except for the exclusion: The truth, beyond the criterion of Marxist praxis or of Lakatosian falsification, is only given by logical compatibility with the statements and propositions of Marxism of social archaeology.

This formality does not solve the problem of the empirical subdetermination of theories.

[Bruce G. Trigger] Understanding Early Civilizations

The pamphletary gibberish of a Marxism that was fossilized in distant State ideologies or the stereotyped formulas through efficient vulgarization texts were common currency at all the levels of the academy. For instance, which will be the appraisal charge of the theory of the cords or the theory of relativity in physics?

With these words, the perfect hinge is highlighted: The archaeological approach to reality-society conceived as a concrete whole- starts from the proposition of an explanation about the whole and its development, a theory that has certain characteristics of a hypothesis.

Joe knows the bank fraud – he just doesn’t believe by-live it. If the truth is what matters, is it reached by an inductive method, with a deductive one or with their dialectical combination? The justification was simple and it was placed in footnotes:. Rather, they try to identify ways of life, variants of structural stability to which they give adjectives without proposing statements of the law type. Thirty years ago, during the seventies, an attempt to apply Marxism called Latin American social archaeology: After the propositional phase in which one of its main achievements was to call the attention towards the theoretical and methodological problems of archaeology that appeared together with the crisis and collapse of the so-called real socialism and with the fall of the Soviet Union, recent social archaeology has shown few novelties, at least from the point of view of the literature that is available; and it is a little abandoned such as the Marxist interpretation that supported it, although this abandonment has been justified alleging whims of fashion and bureaucratic obstacles.


In this area, the questions are: Is it tolerance towards other methodologies as long as the dialectic is superior? From their point of view, in the years prior to the fall of the Soviet Union, an important number of archaeologists and social researchers had affiliated to the Marxist position because of a trend; conviction was a privilege of the minority. This suppose that, apart from being true, they comply with the exigency of logical validity and are, therefore, compatible and interchangeable.

In their texts, there is no reflection to orientate the reader regarding a possible reformulation of the concept and regarding the role it would play to achieve the explicational goal. In the game there are other values different from those exclusively objective.

It is surprising that this is the ontology they have defended to prove that their theoretical position is the best, lakatosianly speaking, although it is not evident which the sufficient and necessary conditions are for the definitions of social formation, way of life and culture, from the Hempelian model, which they also defend. Indigenous peoples and the future of Amazonia: What is included and what excluded? Disease and demography in the Americas. The extended use of these categories has been restricted to the Caribbean area, specifically to Venezuela, Dominican Republic and South America.

This is analyzed through a comparison of some of the topics addressed in the works of seminal figures like Karl Friedrich Philipp von Martius, Francisco Adolfo de Histtoria, and Betty Jane Meggers. Perhaps this long trajectory is not necessary to explain some social formation of the Prehispanic period.

[Bruce G. Trigger] Understanding Early Civilizations

To do this, we use categories that explain the historical process; then we theorize again, we propose new hypothesis to guide the apprehension and, with this body of data, we are able to offer explanations of arqueolpgico reality, to propose new hypothetical formulations that will come back to the intermediate theory, not only as some sort of proof, correction or reformulation, but also as an explanation of the whole, this is, to the general theory that -in any case- acquires once again the character of hypothesis to continue with the cycle of knowing.


Perhaps these are more of the minor differences; however, they acquire relevance arqueplogico they are located in the ontological area, in the theory about the object arqueologioc study and this, according to his own statements, has a direct impact on the methodology. The Post-processual Hruce 4. With the result that the methodological steps stated during more than twenty years have been so by means of inferences:.

Laudan, Larry, La ciencia y el relativismo. Archaeology as a scientific discipline 1. At the end of history, we are all going to think in the same way. The construction of the other is part of the construction of the enemy. However, […] it had a restricted influence as to time the seventies and the early eighties and place Mexico, Peru, Venezuela and Cuba.

Lumbreras, Mario Sanoja, Iraida Vargas: Perhaps it is, in order to discover through other tortuous ways the dialectical relation of the social formation, the way of life and culture as determinants of the concrete history of societies, since these are irremovable, invariant and fixed; we are dealing with the great universal laws that are illuminated by the light of social archaeology.