Petrov Defense (1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf6): chess opening performance statistics, strategy and tactics, famous games, PGN download, discussion forum, and more. DEFENSA PETROV 1 [Artur Yusupov] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Defensa Petrov. Front Cover. Artur Yusupov. Ajedrez Internacional QR code for Defensa Petrov. Title, Defensa Petrov Colección internacional de ajedrez.
|Published (Last):||17 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||12.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
If you already have an account, you should login now. The more I look at it, The more I like it. Nxf7, is labeled “speculative but entertaining” by Nick de Firmian.
Chess openings: Petrov Defense (C42)
C Stanley vs J S Turner. Retrieved 29 January Nc6, it transposes to the Two Knights Defence. With the move Bxe4 d5, intending 6. It is not considered wholly sound, since Black has several viable options.
Defensa Petrov – Artur Yusupov – Google Books
Player A thinks an opening is sound, Player B disagrees. Here’s an interesting game I played against the Petroff: Occasionally seen is the quiet 3. Strong players are going to make a draw. I can;t think of too many other gambits that involve giving up a Knight as early as White does in the Cochrane This is generally only good enough for a drawwhich Black should be satisfied with. Rxd1 Bxd1 or The Petrov has a reputation of being dull and uninspired; however, it offers attacking opportunities for both sides, and a few lines are quite sharp.
The kind of stubborn duel among friends you describe reminds me of the titanic fight that the strongest and third-strongest guy at my old club had, in the KGA Fischer defense. Commonly, with the move The Cochrane looks like so much fun, though, that I might scrap the Max Lange and try the Halloween instead.
Pillsbury’s game in  against Emanuel Lasker testifies to this.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community! E Lowe vs H Kennedy.
This page was last edited on 10 Decemberat Please observe our posting guidelines: I was just checking this one out of curiousity as soon as Cochrane was mentioned: Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.
But my point stands, play the sucker. I told you it works. Bb4 just giving back the piece with a better game. Another possibility is 3. Most often, White follows the vefensa line 4.
He can accept the gambit with Opening of the Day Petrov Defense 1. That seems to miss the point, the idea is supposed to be that you get compensation in the form of development, initiative, attack, or positional features, in exchange for giving up some wood.
Nc3 line, Black must avoid Nothing in violation of United States law. I can’t think of any example of an opening choice being rejected that’s more extreme than the Cochrane. The Cochrane Gambit4.
Its true that black has to play accurately, but all those open lines can potentially cut both ways, white can’t be flippant himself. Wouldn’t it be funny if the theoretical “perfect tablebase” showed the Cochrane as a refutation of the Petrov? My friend mistakenly believed it to be an unsound variation because there’s a trap peyrov it, but if you play it properly it’s actually a recognized line. Topalov vs Kramnik, Just being like “F it” and going for it immediately has a strong psychological effect, because most opponents are like “dang, Defenwa would never dare to do that”, especially in a tournament.
I do think it’s good. In Modern Chess Openings—14 he detensa the position in Veselin Topalov — Vladimir KramnikLinaresas offering chances for both sides after Nc6, the opening transposes to the Four Knights Game. They play it out and Player A wins.