Modélisation UML: Les différents types de diagramme Les diagrammes de composants décrivent les composants physiques et l’architecture. Ces diagrammes sont tous réalisés à partir du besoin des utilisateurs et peuvent Sur quel matériel chacun des composants sera installé?. A UML 2 deployment diagram depicts a static view of the run-time configuration of processing nodes and the components that run on those nodes. In other.

Author: Fek Saramar
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 27 May 2009
Pages: 321
PDF File Size: 3.59 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.70 Mb
ISBN: 570-2-81573-787-6
Downloads: 22920
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudonos

This is so far the most comprehensive book on uml 2. Do you intend to take a fat-client approach where the business logic is contained in a desktop application or a thin-client approach where business logic is deployed to an application server?

When I ask this question of the project teams I work with, we almost always decide to develop some form of deployment model.

UML 2 Deployment Diagrams: An Agile Introduction

Software elements are now simply listed by their physical filenames, information that developers are very likely to be interested in, and thus a more compact diagram is possible. Remember, agile models don’t need to be perfect, they need to be just barely good enough.

It likely doesn’t matter anyway, because the modeling tool s that you’re using likely won’t fully support the current version of the UML notation perfectly anyway. In unified modeling language uml, a component diagram depicts how components are wired together to form larger components or software systems.

Although these diagrams were thoroughly reviewed for the book, and have been reviewed by thousands of people online since then, an error may have gotten past of us. Nodes can contain other nodes or software artifacts.

Bottom line is that you’re going to be constrained by your tools anyway.

Diagramme de composant uml pdf book

Get uml 2 diagram,e et conception pdf phrontisteria library. You need to make platform decisions, such as the hardware and operating systems to be deployed, including how the various nodes will be connected perhaps via RMI and a message bus as in Figure 2. I never draw deployment diagrams following the style show in Figure 1except when I’m writing about deployment modeling, because in my opinion this notation is visually wasteful. Diagramme de composant notion de port bonjour, je suis en train d effectuer des recherches sur les diagrammes de composant en uml et diaggramme viens de dcouvrir la notion de port et je n arrive gref bretagne trouver un lieu d information et l.


The notation may have evolved from when I originally developed the diagrams. I’d also need to model a dependency relationship between the software connection and the hardware connection, perhaps with the stereotype of over. They are used to illustrate the structure of arbitrarily complex systems. The physical connection between the physical hardware nodes is at a lower level, perhaps an Ethernet connection, so in reality I really should have modeled a connection between the hardware nodes with Ethernet as a stereotype and a second connection between software elements with the RMI stereotype.

When you stop and think about it, the stereotypes that I’ve applied to the connections aren’t correct. How agile are deployment diagrams? The three-dimensional boxes represent nodes, either software or hardware.

When determining how to model the deployment architecture for a system, regardless of the artifacts chosen, I will typically:. This is particularly true when you diiagramme modeling an environment consisting of a many interconnected machines.

Deployment specifications are basically configuration files, such as an EJB deployment descriptor, which define how a node should operate. Software artifacts are shown with the visual stereotype of a page with a folded corner or with the textual stereotype artifact or both sometimes, which I also believe is superfluous. Gabays uml 2 analyse et conception pdf home ebooks.

As you can see I didn’t indicate that WebServer is a device — it will at least be some sort of software artifact and very well may be one or more physical devices as diagrammf but my team hasn’t made that decision yet. The unified modeling language reference manual, second edition if you are a serious user of uml, there is no other book quite like this one. How secure does the system need to be do you need a firewall, do you need to physically secure hardware, and so forth?

Another difference is that the concise version shows less details, not as many tagged values are shown as this information can be captured in either supporting documentation, configuration files, or source code. Your distribution strategy will define the general type of nodes you will have, but not the exact details. Les participants n ont pas um2 d etre explicitement declares. Remember, models evolve over time. A UML 2 deployment diagram depicts a static view of the run-time configuration of processing nodes and the components that run on those nodes.


The unified modeling language reference manual james rumbaugh ivar jacobson grady booch addisonwesley an imprint of addison wesley longman, inc.

Modélisation UML/Les différents types de diagramme

Um2 the scope of the model. A better example is shown in Figure 2. Does the diagram address how to deploy a version of a single application or does it depict the deployment of all systems within your organization?

The unified modeling language reference manual temida. Physical nodes should be labeled with the stereotype deviceto indicate that it’s a physical device such as a computer or switch. Your distribution architecture strategy will often be predetermined for your application, particularly if you are deploying your system to an existing technical dlagramme. The unified modeling language reference manual james rumbaugh, ivar jacobson, grady booch.

When determining how to model the deployment architecture for a system, regardless of the artifacts chosen, I will typically: Sometimes a high-level free-form diagram is a better option because the notation is much more flexible. If you’re really concerned about the nuances of “official” UML notation then read the current version of the UML specification. In coposant, you may want to consider creating a deployment diagram for all but the most trivial of systems.

In reality the software on the web server is communicating via the RMI protocol over the connection to diagrammw software on the application server.

In other words, deployment diagrams show the hardware for your system, the software that is installed on that hardware, and the middleware used to connect the disparate machines to one another. To determine whether you need to create a deployment model, ask diagrammd this: Diagramme global dinteraction interaction overview diagram.

The xiagramme components use the same notation as component diagrams I could have annotated them with their interfaces although that wouldn’t have added any value in my opinion. The UML evolves over time, and I may not have kept the diagrams up to date. Will your application have two tiers, three tiers, or more? As always, it depends on your goals. How robust does your system need to be will there be diagrwmme hardware to failover to?

Posted in Sex