जनहित याचिका (Janhit Yachika). by अँड. वि. पु. शिंत्रे (Adv. V. P. Shintre). ISBN: Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this. Title, Meri Janhit Yachika Evam Anya Kahaniyan. Author, Pradeep Shrivastav. Language, Hindi. Year, Binding, PB. Pages, p. ISBN, , Bharat Main Janhit Yachika Aur Manav Adhikar by Aruna Rai, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.
|Published (Last):||25 May 2015|
|PDF File Size:||13.4 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.71 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Case That Saved Indian Democracy. A definite attempt was made by it to secure a ban on these activities with the ultimate intention of increasing the demand of cast and ductile iron products as they are some of the suitable substitute for asbestos.
In this jabhit, the Supreme Court upheld that the prisoners should get benefit of free legal aid and fast hearing. Views Read Edit View history. After the emergency era the high court reached out to the people, devising a means for any person of the public or an NGO to approach the court seeking legal remedy in cases where the public interest is at stake.
Kapadiahas stated that substantial “fines” would be imposed on litigants filing frivolous PILs.
Public interest litigation in India – Wikipedia
The court must be satisfied that the Writ petition fulfils some basic needs for PIL as the letter is addressed by the aggrieved person, public spirited individual and a social action group for the enforcement of legal or Constitutional rights janit any person who are not able to approach the court for redress.
Such cases may be filed in the public interest when victims lack the capability to commence litigation, or their freedom to petition the court has been encroached.
Any citizen can file yahika public case by filing a petition:. Nijjar observed in their judgment. Jabhit Iyerwas also part of it till his death on 4 December Bhagwati who pioneered PIL. A PIL may be filed against state government, central government, municipal authority not any private party.
The Court entertained a letter from two professors at the University of Delhi seeking enforcement of the constitutional right of inmates at a protective home in Agra who were living in inhuman and degrading conditions. The bench clarified that it was necessary to erase the impression on some that the superior courts, by entertaining PIL petitions for the poor who could not seek protection of their rightsexceeded the unwritten boundaries of their jurisdiction.
All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June A similar petition was then submitted to the Supreme Court. There after many cases like this have registered in the supreme court.
In Citizens for Democracy through its President v. E-mail Newsletter Sign up now to receive updates from us. In DecemberKapila Hingorani had filed a petition regarding the condition of the prisoners detained in the Bihar jail, whose suits were pending in the court. Jachika Kalyaneshwari vs Union of Indiathe court cited the misuse of public-interest litigation in business conflicts.
The judgement of the case recognized sexual harassment as yzchika violation of the fundamental constitutional rights of Article 14Article 15 and Article This case was against sexual harassment at work place, brought by Bhanwari Devi to stop the marriage of a one year old girl in rural Rajasthan. Naina Kapoor decided to initiate a PIL to challenge sexual harassment at work place, in this supreme court. It is a new legal horizon in which court of law can initiate and enforce action to serve and secure significant Public Interest Litigation.
Public interest litigation in India
The framers of Indian constitution did not incorporate a strict doctrine of separation of powers but envisaged a system of checks and balances. Any public-spirited person can file a PIL case.
Retrieved from ” https: In this case, the court passed three landmark judgements and several orders against polluting industries which were more than 50, in the Ganga basin. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly pointed out that laws enacted for achieving the goals set out in the Preamble to the Constitution were inadequate; the benefits of welfare measures embodied in the legislation had not reached millions of poor people, and efforts to bridge the gap between rich and poor did not yield the desired results.
Sudershan Reddy and S. Further, through the so-called PIL, the litigants can focus attention on and achieve results pertaining to larger public issues, especially in the fields of human rights, consumer welfare and environment. The credibility of PIL process is now adversely affected by the criticism that the judiciary is overstepping the boundaries pf its jurisdiction and that it is unable to supervise the effective implementation of its orders.
In Miss Veena Sethi v.
The publisher, however, discontinued distribution because of contempt of court proceedings initiated by the Calcutta High Court. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A bench consisting of Justices G. Helping the ministry was former Chief Justice of India late P. Proudly Powered by Blogger.
A litigant who approaches the court must come with clean hands. The Charter Act It gives an opportunity to opposite parties to ascertain the precise allegation and respond specific issues. Government Of Yachikw Act On behalf Of group Of affected peoples. The Supreme Court found that the high court decided against the accused with little information about Reddy himself.
This page was last edited on 20 Decemberat The credentials, the motive and the objective of the petitioner have to be apparently and patently aboveboard. Krishna Iyer were among the first judges to admit PILs in court. Understanding the Right to Constitutional Remedies: This petition was filed by the name of the prisoner, Hussainara Khatoon, hence the petition came to be known as Hussainara Khatoon Vs State of Bihar. Five men raped her. The guidelines also directed for sexual harassment prevention.