The Sleepwalkers has ratings and 80 reviews. Manny said: Koestler’s book presents a rather good history of cosmology from ancient times until the lat. Arthur Koestler. The Sleepwalkers. A History of Man’s changing vision of the Universe. With an Introduction by. Herbert Butterfield. 1. Awakening. We can add to. ovelist, essayist and political man of action, Arthur Koestler emerges in this book as a historian of the sciences. He traces, with a comic writer’s eye and a.
|Published (Last):||5 December 2005|
|PDF File Size:||20.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
See 1 question about The Sleepwalkers…. The contrast was not against the traditional Ptolemaic system everything goes round the Earthbut against the much more sophisticated system proposed by Tycho Brahe the Sun and the Moon go round the Earth, all the other planets go round the Sun. In addition to this, in the first half Koestler traced the views of the universe from the ancient world, the middle ages through the Ionian school up until the age of Newton.
Koestler offers us here a very interesting review of man’s struggle to overcome his biases and understand his surroundings. Amazing context historic, scientific, religious, moral, but above all – human given to the subject of how the universe works.
Of particular interest are the quite detailed biographical sections of Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, and Kepler. He wasn’t exactly flattered by Copernicus or Galileo, and though he clearly respected Kepler’s genius, he also portrayed him as a distracted genius who either by accident or through distractio A series of well researched essays on Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo, and how they stumbled, or in Koestler’s words – sleepwalked, their way through their eponymous works and discoveries.
Years following one approach, not comfortable with the results, then another major approach, then another, fruitlessly trying to solve the I have now read this book 3 times and I think I will re-read it at least one or two more times! This history is all good but when sleepqalkers becomes too much the tide turns.
On Rereading Arthur Koestler’s Sleepwalkers
May 31, Mbogo J rated it really liked it. If you are more interested in the people behind the ideas then you will enjoy it but if you are like me who is more interested in the ideas with marginal interest in the people behind it, then you might not enjoy it so much.
The Search for the Beginning and End of the Universe. I completely see why everyone expects me to have read it or to flip out when I do. A highly recommended read, if you are interested in any of the above mentioned. sledpwalkers
Looking at it now I realize I sleepwaokers add it to the read-again-if you-discover-you’re-immortal category. Koestler uses this detailed history of human accomplishment through human means to illustrate the necessity of return to primordial truth while holding onto the underlying wisdom that we gain through various advancements. Hung Tran Plato is obssessed with the idea that everything can be constructed from the above, by centralization and theorization.
He made no contribution to theoretical astronomy he did not throw down weights from the leaning tower of Pisa, and did not prove the truth of the Copernican system.
I think I read 2 of Koestler’s bks. Koestler wanted to probe the almost mystical elements involved in the greatest of human discoveries, especially in the sciences; the title refers to his belief that so many of the pioneers in cosmography sleepwalmers and toiled down fruitless pathways using their powers of reason and logic, and only made their crucial breakthroughs under the inspiration of sudden flashes of insight that seemed to bubble up, unbidden and unawares, from the murky depths of the unconscious.
Mamaine Koestler’s Letters —51 Arthur Koestler: An excellent in depth story about the development of astronomy and the people who made the measurements and interpreted the results.
The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man’s Changing Vision of the Universe by Arthur Koestler
It may wait a hundred years for a reader, since God has also waited six thousand years for a witness Koestler describes the creators of the history of cosmic theories as obsessive and schizophrenic, with acts of insight imitating a sleepwalker, rather than a great universal thinker.
This author is amazing. In order to make revolutionary discoveries, one must peal back the layers of accepted thought and question dogma. Reading Koestler for the first time, just released, Koestler changed me to a totally different person.
He indicates how the appalling part in the middle of science and religion emerged and how, specificallythe advanced world perspective supplanted the medieval world view in the logical denouement of the seventeenth century. He shows how the tragic split between science and religion arose and how, in particular, the modern world-view replaced the medieval world-view in the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century.
Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go. The longest section in the book is about Kepler, clearly Koestler’s favorite. I would advise the reader to do the same, if you read it as your primary read there is a good chance you will shelve it after the umpteenth letter telling Copernicus to get rid of his mistress.
Want to Read saving…. The Philosophy of Nature became ethically neutral, and “blind” became the favourite adjective for the working of natural law.
In between is not a continuous stream of cosmological evolution, but a rapid, initial advancement followed by a regression or de-evolution lasting for 1, years during the Dark Ages. One who didn’t want to ‘rock the boat’ when it came to the church.
View all 8 comments.