The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Hobbes to Locke). By C. B. Macpherson. Oxford University Press, Those of us who have had the good . C. B. Macpherson’s The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke challenged the canonical interpretation of seventeenth-century . Introduction. The roots of liberal-democratic theory — Problems of interpretation — Hobbe: the political obligation of the market. Philosophy and political theory.
|Published (Last):||24 August 2004|
|PDF File Size:||9.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Oxford University Press is a department individuslism the University of Oxford. The present study … individuaoism that the difficulties of modern liberal-democratic theory lie deeper than had been thought, that the original seventeenth-century individualism contained the central difficulty, which lay in its possessive quality. Leemans – – Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie An odd blend of the irrelevance, tedium and brilliance.
Hobbesian Philosophy Still Sways Scholars. Tawney ratepayer franchise rational reason Second Treatise sect servants and alms-takers seventeenth-century social sovereign power things thought tion Treatises of Government wage wage-earners whole Woodhouse.
Fundamentally, Macpherson is interested indiviualism helping formulate a political theory that lays a powerful normative base for social democracy. Man’s Emerging Mind – The late N.
polifical This page was last edited on 1 Octoberat The ‘Disembodied Self’ in Political Theory: The problem of franchise — Types of franchise — The record — Theoretical implications — Harrington: The individual is essentially the proprietor of his own person and capacities, for which he owes nothing to society. John Kilcullen – unknown. The ;ossessive Party seems to be a contemporary descendant of this ideology. The human essence is freedom from dependence on the wills of others, and freedom is a function of possession.
So nice to see someone post about MacPherson! The roots of liberal-democratic theory — Problems of interpretation — Hobbe: Human society consists of a series of market relations.
C. B. Macpherson
Roy Request an Inspection Copy. Philosophy and Political Theory 2: Leviathan Thomas Hobbes, J.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. What is the social context of this ideology? Following a tradition that began with G. The seventeenth-century foundations — The twentieth-century dilemma — Appendix: Macpherson was first published by the Clarendon Press inand remains of key importance to the study of liberal-democratic theory half-a-century later. The productive and regulative work of the society is authoritatively allocated to groups, ranks, classes, or persons.
C. B. Macpherson – Wikipedia
The Roots of Liberal-Democratic Theory 2. For the exchange to be polihical voluntary “the proviso that is needed is whether to enter into any exchange at all. A first wave of criticism of individuwlism liberalism took this form: Macpherson spent most of his career battling these premises, but perhaps the greatest single exposition of this view can be found in The Political Theory of Possessive Individualismwhere Macpherson examines the function of this particular kind of individualism in HobbesHarrington and Locke and several writers in between, including the Levellers and its resulting pervasiveness throughout most liberal literature of the period.
From the Publisher via CrossRef no proxy pq. Common terms and phrases accumulation agrarian alienate analysis appropriation argued argument army assertion assumed assumptions balance behaviour bourgeois capacities capital civil society cohesion common commonwealth competitive concept consent consistent copyholders deduced doctrine economic England English essential established estimates excluded franchise classes freedom freeholder franchise gentry Harrington Hobbes Hobbes’s mqcpherson Ibid in-servants individual inference individuslism of money Ireton John Lilburne justice King’s labour labouring class land law of nature Levellers Leviathan liberty indiivdualism Locke Locke’s logical man’s manhood franchise manhood suffrage market relations men’s model of society moral natural law necessary nobility non-servant franchise obligation from fact Oceana overbalance person physiological postulates political obligation political theory position possessive market society principle produce property in one’s Putney debate R.
Class Differentials in Natural Rights and Rationality 4. Music Neuroscience Philosophy Physical Sciences.
The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke
For Friedman, economic freedom needed to be protected because it ensured political freedom. Do you want to combine it with some stronger protection of the individual? Models of Society 4: In other terms, it is a micro-to-macro argument up the struts of Coleman’s boat. The individualism that Macpherson identifies is of a specific sort; it is “possessive” individualism.
John Locke and the Origins of Private Property: The repair that was needed [to liberal theory] was one that would bring back a sense of the moral worth of the individual, and combine it again with a sense of the moral value of community, which had been present in some measure in the Puritan and Lockean theory. Science Logic and Mathematics. Friedman also contended that where socialism links economics with politics, economics cannot act as a check on political power within a socialist society, as it can in a capitalist society.
C. B. Macpherson, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke – PhilPapers
Macpherson highlights the interpretive challenge of discovering these underlying assumptions: I have many times wishes to write a similar survey of “possessive collectivism. The Equal Commonwealth and the Equal Agrarian 5: Brian Tierney – – Speculum 67 1: It is the posseessive of market society: Podsessive Logic and Mathematics. For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQsand if you can”t find the answer there, please contact us.
Indivldualism Nature and the State of Nature 3. The Seventeenth-Century Foundations 2. Retrieved from ” https: Insecurity, Citizenship, and Globalization: Its possessive quality is found in its conception of the individual as essentially the proprietor of his own person or capacities, owing nothing to society for them.
The unexpected has happened, and the shock waves are still being absorbed.